is unheard of는 (can) hear of 에서 파생되었다?
[가정] is unheard of는 (can) hear of 에서 파생되었다?
Because original TV programming in Cambodia / is practically unheard of.
=> Because original TV programming in Cambodia / isn't practically heard of. [is unheard -> is not heard.]
=> Because original TV programming in Cambodia / isn't practically heard of by anybody. [by anybody 생략 부분 복구]
=> Because nobody practically (can) hear of original TV programming in Cambodia. [not + anybody => nobody로 전환]
* hear of 만으로도 족하나, 의미상 can을 추가.
[가정에 대한 검증 및 가정의 일반화 시도 - 예시에 대입하여 값이 성립하는가 검증]
1) 자동사 hear : hear + of / from / about sth 가능.
ex 1) I've never heard of the place
ex 2) I was sorry to hear about your accident
ex 3) I look forward to hearing from you.
2) hear of sth 구문을 수동태로 고치기 : sth is heard of
3) sth is heard of + not => sth is not heard of
4) not heard of 를 unheard of 로 전환
5) sth is unheard of 완성 ^^
6) ex3)에 적용 : I've never heard of the place -> The place has been unheard of [by me].
7) has been unheard of 로 검색 : 아래의 예문들을 발견 -> 일반화 성공!
- This would have been unheard of a few years ago .
- A couple of years ago, that would have been unheard of.
- Six months ago this would have been unheard of.
[결론] "is unheard of는 (can) hear of 에서 파생되었다? " 는 가정은 옳다! ^^
Enjoy your learning !
'언어공부' 카테고리의 다른 글
V + A + from + v-ing 왜 항상 forbid가 답인가? (0) | 2025.04.02 |
---|---|
우리말 '-지' 띄어쓰기, 영어 문장을 통해 쉽게 기억하는 방법! (0) | 2025.04.02 |
... it that... 구문 정리 : ex) see to it that... (중국어, 프랑스어 동의어 찾기) (0) | 2025.04.02 |
below, beneath, underneath, under의 차이? (0) | 2025.04.02 |
복수가 되면 뜻이 달라지는 단어? -ing VS -ings (0) | 2025.04.02 |